Politics

Report: Inspector General Claims Whistleblower Worked For ‘One of the 2020 Democrat Candidates’

A new bombshell report just came out, suggesting that the (fake) “whistleblower” has actually worked for – in some professional or personal way – one of the 2020 Democrat candidates.

This could be yet another reason why the Democrats are desperate to keep the (fake) whistleblowers identity hidden.

You can watch the video on that below:

Recently, we were told that the (fake) “whistleblower” was a registered Democrat. However, this this latest news would be a definite game-changer and go a long way in proving that yet again, the Democrats are pushing another one of their famous political hit jobs.

Evil McCains: Opinion: How John and Cindy McCain’s Deep Ties to Corrupt Ukraine Government Were Used Against Trump

The new report claims the IG is the one who made the statement about the (fake) “whistleblower” having some close type of personal or professional relationship with one of the candidates.

Now, however, there is word of more evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower’s part. Under questioning from Republicans during last Friday’s impeachment inquiry interview with Atkinson, the inspector general revealed that the whistleblower’s possible bias was not that he was simply a registered Democrat. It was that he had a significant tie to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year’s election.

“The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates,” said one person with knowledge of what was said.

“The IG said the whistleblower had a professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates,” said another person with knowledge of what was said.

“What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate,” said a third person with knowledge of what was said.

All three sources said Atkinson did not identify the Democratic candidate with whom the whistleblower had a connection. It is unclear what the working or professional relationship between the two was.

In the Aug. 26 letter, Atkinson said that even though there was evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower’s part, “such evidence did not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern ‘appears credible,’ particularly given the other information the ICIG obtained during its preliminary review.”

Democrats are certain to take that position when Republicans allege that the whistleblower acted out of bias. Indeed, the transcript of President Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a public document, for all to see. One can read it regardless of the whistleblower’s purported bias.

Nevertheless, Republicans will want to know more about the origins of the whistleblower complaint, especially given the unorthodox use of whistleblower law involved. There is more to learn — like who the Democratic candidate is — before Republicans will say they know enough about what happened. [Washington Examiner]

Wouldn’t it be ironic if it was Joe Biden, and his own plan to take down Trump, backfired on him?

Let us know what you think about this latest turn of events in the comments below.

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.

Leave a Comment