Culture

Virginia Federal Judge Rules For Transgender Students In Bathroom Case — Says Ban Was Discriminatory

What about the normal kids who don’t want to share a bathroom/locker room with the opposite sex? Do their feelings not matter?

On Friday, a federal judge in Virginia rejected a school’s policy regarding transgender students and bathroom use. The ruling was seen as a victory for transgender students seeking access to the bathrooms of their choosing.

According to Fox News, U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen’s opinion was: “There is no question that the board’s policy discriminates against transgender students on the basis of their gender nonconformity.”

This judge must have rocks instead of brains. Why were restrooms separated for men and women in the first place? For privacy. So now that we have crazy people who don’t know which gender they are, or prefer to be what they are not, I suggest the schools have a men’s room, a women’s room and a transgender room for those who don’t mind having their privacy invaded by the other sex. Men and women still have a right to privacy, regardless of the wishes (not rights) of transgender people.

Related: SCOTUS Sides With Trump Admin On Temporarily Reinstating Military Transgender Ban

This is not a complex issue. Biological sex is an immutable physiological fact. “Presenting” yourself as something different is an issue of mental illness and behavior. Trans people are not something other than their biological sex; they are pretenders and frauds – regardless of the degree to which they believe their delusion.

A federal judge in Virginia ruled Friday in favor of a transgender former student, concluding that a school board’s transgender restroom ban was discriminatory.

“There is no question that the board’s policy discriminates against transgender students on the basis of their gender nonconformity,” U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen in Norfolk wrote in her decision, putting an end to a four-year lawsuit brought against Gloucester High School by former student Gavin Grimm.

“Under the policy, all students except for transgender students may use restrooms corresponding with their gender identity,” she continued. “Transgender students are singled out, subjected to discriminatory treatment and excluded from spaces where similarly situated students are permitted to go.”

Trending: MD State Trooper Under Investigation After RIPPING Out Car Window During Traffic Stop!

Grimm, a transgender male, was forced to use the girl’s restroom or a private restroom and was prohibited from using the men’s room as a result of the school’s policy, despite the fact that he underwent chest reconstruction surgery and hormone therapy as part of his transition. [Fox News]

“Allen based her decision on the Constitution’s equal protection clause and Title IX, a federal policy banning gender-based discrimination.”

This is the most important quote in the entire article. Because title nine does not ban gender-based discrimination. Title IX bands sex discrimination. There may be 1000 genders, but there are only two sexes, male and female. And what we are allowing these crooked judges to do is we are allowing these crooked judges to conflate the term gender with the term sex which is garbage.

This is absurd and will lead to all kinds of problems — particularly for the transgender student. Privacy rights of the vast majority of students are being violated. Do they not count? Many schools have tried to make reasonable compromises by providing separate facilities for the trans-students but this did not satisfy the LGBTQ students, supported by the all-powerful ACLU. It’s definitely ruled by the minority which is WRONG and UNFAIR. As soon as the trans student gets molested in a boys’ locker room (which unfortunately could easily happen) There will be all kinds of lawsuits, etc. There’s a simple solution and that is to provide these individuals with private facilities. Why don’t they accept that?

Trending: Scaramucci Calls Out Trump’s Behavior During His Visits To El Paso And Dayton — On MSNBC

All this because Barack Obama thought it would be fun to toss a match over his shoulder on the way out and start this ball rolling. It is a nihilistic debasement of our culture in the name of a fraction of a percent of Americans. Also, female sports are going away slowly as males identify as females to win trophies.

Where is the law association that is supposed to remove these lying judges concerning their knowledge of the law? The Constitution does not include sexual needs in any of its laws. It says equal rights as in being a citizen both females and males have the same rights to pursue happiness and be an equal person before the law pertaining to due process and representation by lawyers in legal dealings. To PURSUE is the key. It does not guarantee you get what you want. As for Title whatever when did the citizens vote for that. Aren’t titles suppose to be voted on in federal elections. If not than titles have nothing to do with our Constitution.

Instead of the current socialist take over of our American way of life, it is time to start going after the communist judges and remove them as terrorists to our way of life and kill the anti-cultural laws these terrorists have made against our American culture as that is precisely what they are doing by deliberately misreading the Constitution and adding their made-up interpretation of what the Constitution says.

Congratulations to the ACLU the American Communist Party, Stalin would be proud of how far you have succeeded.

Listen to the Wayne Dupree Show podcast! It’s free and on your regular podcast app. Tune in, share and leave a review.

 

Leave a Comment