Does anyone trust Justice Roberts?
Not after that infamous Obamacare ruling.
Many conservatives believe the Deep State as “something” on Roberts and are pulling the strings on him. That certainly would explain some of his nutty rulings.
Another interesting thing to think about is that Cheif Justice Reports is the man who is responsible for the FISA Court – the court that wildly screwed over President Trump and helped kick off the entire Russia collusion bullcrap.
Was the court duped or was the court complicit?
It’s just very interesting that Roberts is the man who oversees it.
The bad news is, Roberts will be presiding over the Senate trial and Mo Brooks is not happy about it. He says that Roberts is “mentally erratic” on issues and basically feels like he’s a wildcard.
I agree. I don’t trust him either.
During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN, Brooks referred to Roberts’ 2012 opinion in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, which upheld the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, as justification for his skepticism in the chief justice’s abilities.
“Justice Roberts has been mentally erratic in his legal foundation for the opinions he has written,” Brooks said on “The Jeff Poor Show.” “By way of one example, out of nine Supreme Court justices, he was the only one who thought that Obamacare was not socialized medicine, was not some kind of government health care program. He thought it was a tax increase, therefore it was permissible; therefore, the government could mandate that the American people be forced to buy products that they may or may not want, OK? Now that’s a direct conflict with the liberty and freedoms established in the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution. But Justice Roberts engaged in this kind of legal gymnastics in his own brain that all eight of the other Supreme Court justices thought was rather bizarre. But nonetheless, he was the deciding vote on Obamacare. So, I don’t trust John Roberts’ judgment.”
“I don’t know where he is going to come down in this matter,” he continued. “I don’t know what kind of trial court judge he would be. I don’t know if he would be passive. I don’t know if he would be aggressive. Typically, the trial judge by way of example would be responsible for making evidentiary rulings, what is admissible in a trial and what is not. And I don’t know if John Roberts is in a position to do that in a way that I believe is appropriate. So, I do have some reservations about John Roberts based on his rather erratic rationales for the kinds of opinions that he issues on the United States Supreme Court. I would much rather we have someone who is fairly consistent and reliable — someone we could trust in a reasoned way to come up with what is fair and just.” [Breitbart]
The last thing we need is some Deep State puppet making key rulings and moves to help the bad guys roll out more phony witnesses to try and add fuel to their impeachment stunt fire.
We want this to go as quickly as possible – that is, if the Dems ever send over the articles LOL until that time, experts argue President Trump isn’t even technically impeached.
Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.