Jerry Nadler’s impeachment hearing was a bust. It actually made Adam Schiff’s circus look legitimate – and that’s saying a lot since Schiff’s hearings were a total joke and embarrassment.
Nadler trotted out three elitist anti-Trump college professors to share their “feelings” and “opinions” on why they think Trump should be impeached.
What a total waste of time and taxpayer money.
Much like Schiff’s impeachment charade, Nadler’s was just a bunch of Trump-haters complaining. There was no first-hand knowledge of anything, no evidence. Just a #Resistance rally for people who hate President Trump with an abnormal amount of passion.
While Schiff’s witnesses were insufferable windbags, Nadler’s were insufferable and downright mean, not to mention liars.
Nadler’s star witness Noah Freeman said under oath that he was an “impeachment skeptic” until July 2019.
You can watch the video below:
"Until this call on July 25th I was an 'impeachment skeptic.' The call changed my mind sir, and for good reason."
— PBS NewsHour (@NewsHour) December 4, 2019
However, investigative journalist Mike Cernovich says “not so fast.”
It turns out that Harvard Professor Noah Feldman had been in favor of impeachment for quite some time now.
That means he lied during his sworn testimony.
Will anything be done about it? Don’t hold your breath.
Noah Feldman’s own words contradict his testimony.
In a May 17, 2017 story in Vice about the Comey firing, Professor Feldman said:
What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable, and obstruction of justice in the sense of being a “high crime and misdemeanor.” But it’s almost certainly not a crime of obstruction of justice.
When pressed to provide more nuance about impeachment, Professor Feldman said:
So just to clarify, this looks like obstruction of justice in the high crimes and misdemeanors sense but not in the Jeff Sessions–led Justice Department will do anything about it sense? Correct. And frankly, breaking the norm of politicizing law enforcement—it’s a great basis for impeachment. It’s not a crime, and in fact it’s in the president’s constitutional authority, but it’s still impeachable. That’s the whole point—the president can do things within his legal constitutional authority where the only sanction available under our system is impeachment.
Feldman doesn’t qualify his statement. He doesn’t express skepticism or doubt. He is clear with his words: “What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable.” [Cernovich.com]
Mr. Cernovich cites even more examples of Professor Feldman’s impeachment frenzy in his piece. I encourage you to read more here.
Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.