During last week’s public impeachment (sham) hearings, the desperate Democrats trotted out a Deep Stage puppet by the name of Alex Vindamn.

Vindman, another #NeverTrump stooge appeared before the House committee and offered nothing in the way of “evidence” to prove President Trump did anything wrong during his call (that we all read the transcript for) with Ukraine President Zelensky.

Vindman was reportedly on the call and he “felt” alarmed at what he heard. So, he testified about his “feelings,” which nobody except #Resistance kooks care about.

Regardless, he was hailed an “American hero” simply because he doesn’t like Trump.

Americans Have Had Enough:  [VIDEO] Masked Protester Blocking Car Found Out The Painful Way That Hardworking Americans Have Had Enough 

When do you think the country should re-open and get back to work?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from WayneDupree.com and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

However, one thing Vindman has been called is a “whistleblower.” Until now.

As a matter of fact, during Vindaman’s testimony Rep. Jim Jordan even brought up the “whistleblower” after Vindman claimed he talked to “someone” high-up in the CIA about Trump’s Ukraine call.

While he was questioning Mr. Vindman, impeachment ringmaster Schiff interrupted him and accused him of “outing the whistleblower.”

Jordon fired back saying, “I don’t see how this is outing the whistleblower. The witness has testified that he does not know who the whistleblower is. You have said, even though no one believes you, you have said you don’t know who the whistleblower is…”

You can watch that video below:

So, why is it that Senator Chuck Schumer just referred to Vindman as a “whistleblower” in a recently published tweet?

All along, we’ve been led to believe that Vindman heard the call and then went to the “whistleblower” and told him about it. Which felt very coordinated and strange, to begin with.

So, many people were surprised when Schumer took to Twitter and wrote this tweet:

“LTC Alexander Vindman and whistleblowers like him are patriots. They are standing up for the Constitution they swore an oath to defend. They don’t deserve these disgraceful attacks, and they must be protected from reprisals.”

So, the question is…why would Schumer call Vindman a “whistleblower?” Unless of course, HE is THE whistleblower?

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.