It isn’t a strange coincidence that Julian Assange was arrested and taken into custody by the U.K. He had become a big problem for U.S. intel officials and he had to be silenced.

In order to understand the type of threat that Assange posed to the CIA, you need to look at the type of plot that they were scheming back in 2016, and the roles that key officials like Peter Strzok were playing. Strzok was the “middle-man” between the CIA and the FBI during the 2016 “coup” attempt against President Trump.

See, the CIA was using foreign and U.S. intelligence officers to try and snare Trump campaign officials in their elaborate web. The CIA used Stefan Halper to go after Trump campaign official Carter Page and  General Michael Flynn.  The CIA also used a female FBI agent who went by the name “Azra Turk,” to help Halper targeted another Trump campaign official by the name of George Papadopoulos.

Everyone is Shaking: UK Intel Officials Are Dumbfounded and Shaken, ‘Barr is Looking to do a Hatchet Job on His Own Intelligence Services’

The CIA’s plot to snare Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas.

Because of specific restrictive laws in the U.S., the CIA was unable to much of their “dirty work,” so this is where former FBI official Peter Strozk comes into play.

Do you think President Biden should be impeached for the crisis in Afghanistan and loss of American lives?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Peter Strzok eagerly acted as the “middle-man” between the CIA and the FBI, in order to bypass those pesky laws that the CIA could not circumvent on their own. This worked out perfect for Brennan, who could continue his plot to remove President Trump under the guise of “Russia collusion.”

So, what does all of this have to do with Julian Assange, and why did Strozk, Brennan and the DOJ need him arrested, and why did the U.K. agree to help?

Do you recall some time ago when U.S. Congressman Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange and said that Assange can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents did not come from Russia? That’s a key piece to this puzzle. Assange was ready to talk…And they couldn’t allow that to happen.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. [The Hill]

Famed journalist “Sundance” from the amazing investigative site “Conservative Tree House” unravels the mystery.

Gavin Sit Down and Shut Up: Gavin Newsom Tries to Get ‘High and Mighty’ With Trump But His Argument Goes up in Flames

Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange; and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.

Within three months of the grand jury the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.  The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe was ongoing.

As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).

As a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA)  in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.

It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.

This is critical.  The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements. [Conservative Tree House]

So, here you have the CIA and the FBI, who have teamed up to work together to create this elaborate Russia collusion story that all hinges on the (fake) fact that Russia hacked the DNC on behalf of President Trump and in order to help him win the 2016 election. If that is exposed as a lie, the entire intel house of cards collapses and opens them up to the type of probe that Barr and Durham are now conducting.

Amazing Story: Reporter Embedded With Trumps For 2 Years Says Media Got it Wrong ‘Melania and Donald Aren’t Estranged, They’re Tender Lovers, Who Playfully Tease Each Other’

So, the CIA, FBI, and their pals in the U.K, who helped them with this plot are desperate to keep Assange quiet because they know he has the evidence to prove that everything they said happened, was a lie…and for the first time, it looked like Assange was willing to talk, thanks to that comment from Congressman Rohrabacher.

They couldn’t allow that to happen, so Asssange was neutralized immediately.

The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim.  The FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining that claim.  All of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a vested self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.

Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.

This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus…. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public.

Now, if we know this, and you know this; and everything is cited and factual… well, then certainly AG Bill Barr knows this.

The $64,000 dollar question is: will they say so publicly? [Conservative Tree House]

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here to help Wayne battle the fake news media.