In an unthinkable turn of events, a California appeals court just overturned the conviction in the Kate Steinle case.
Young Kate Steinle was shot by an illegal alien while strolling on the pier with her father and a friend. Steinle was struck in the back by the bullet and died.
Illegal alien Garcia Zarate had been deported five times and served time in federal prison for re-entering the U.S. illegally. He was facing deportation at the time of Kate’s murder.
The unjust ruling was based on the court’s conclusion that evidence showed the fatal round ricocheted off the concrete before striking Steinle.
This latest ruling is just further proof that liberal sanctuary city policies are literally killing and injuring Americans.
The federal government must step in to restore order and safety to these criminal sanctuaries. Every city or state official who is involved in furthering sanctuary city policies should be dismissed from their post immediately so that law and order can be restored for the American people.
A California state appeals court Friday overturned the lone conviction against an undocumented immigrant who shot and killed Kate Steinle on the San Francisco waterfront in 2015, a case that drew national attention and became a flashpoint in the debate over illegal immigration.
Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate, who was in the U.S. illegally and had been deported to his native Mexico five times, was acquitted in November 2017 of first- and second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a semi-automatic weapon. He was convicted of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
DEMS PUT ILLEGAL ALIENS FIRST: WATCH: Biden Says ‘Illegals become Americans before Americans become Americans’
On Friday, the 1st District Court of Appeal in San Francisco overturned that conviction, saying the judge failed to give the jury the option of acquitting Garcia-Zarate on the theory he possessed the weapon for only a moment.
Prosecutors argued that the jury instruction lapse was harmless because Garcia-Zarate admitted firing the gun and experts said he couldn’t do so without pulling the trigger. The court disagreed, saying the jury’s verdict showed they rejected the prosecution theory that the shooting was intentional or even negligent and they had asked the judge to define possession and whether there was a time requirement for possession. [Fox News]
You can watch above, via CBS SF Bay Area
Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.