Rep. Mike Johnson was booed at a Reparations Congressional Hearing claiming that reparations for slavery would be “unconstitutional on their face.”

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee has been the force behind this House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties entitled “H.R. 40 and the Path to Restorative Justice,” at which witnesses were to testify about reparations for slavery.

This HR 40 is a bill that proposes a commission to study reparations. I’ve said over and over how the Democrats like to do things for history purposes so today’s hearing on Juneteenth, the anniversary of the full abolition of slavery in the United States.

Rep. Johnson, the ranking member on the subcommittee, was booed during his opening remarks. He praised the “sincerity” of the witnesses and the supporters of reparations, but he claimed that reparations would be an “injustice.”

Johnson: “Barack Obama opposed reparations when he ran for president in 2008, and Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders did, as well, eight years later,”

“In addition to all this, here in the Judiciary Committee, we have an obligation to acknowledge that any monetary reparations that might be recommended by the commission created by HR 40 would almost certainly be unconstitutional on their face,”

Do you think President Biden should be impeached for the crisis in Afghanistan and loss of American lives?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Rep. Steve Cohen, Subcommittee Chairman, gaveled for order, as Johnson tried to continue.

WOW! Klobuchar Says Democrats Do PACK Stadiums And Cuomo’s Reaction Is PRICELESS!

Johnson: “The reason for that, wait a minute, the reason for that is a legal question.”

That’s when Johnson cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Virginia v. Croson., which he said was decided in 1995.

Johnson: “See the legal question is the federal government can’t constitutionally provide compensation today to a specific racial group because other members of that group, maybe several generations ago, were discriminated against,” That case was actually decided in 1989. Adarand Constructors v. Pena  was the 1995 case he was thinking of, but then he quoted the decision in a 1972 case and a 1979 case, not the one he cited.

Get Your “America #1 Jersey” For 35% Off & A FREE Limited Edition NAVY Trump 2020 Hat! (Guaranteed Delivery Before 4th Of July!)

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here to help Wayne battle the fake news media.