Late Saturday night, President Trump made a stunning tweet announcement about Judge Andrew Napolitano.

We have come to call him Judge Nap because we always thought he was fair and balanced with is reporting. Many Trump supporters enjoyed listening to him because he used to defend Trump’s position according to the law, but he’s changed and many didn’t know why while others had their suspicions.

Get Your Newly Released Limited Edition 24K Gold-Plated TRUMP 2020 Coin while supplies LAST!!

When Trump dropped this bombshell, my jaw hit the floor.

When do you think the country should re-open and get back to work?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from WayneDupree.com and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

After doing some research, I found an op-ed by Judge Nap where he called out the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh and he was deadset against it. I vaguely remember this when I was watching Fox & Friends in the morning, but he was shocked President Trump had made the decision to choose Kavanaugh and voiced it.

But is that a strong reason to slam the President every time he appears on television? A man is defined by his character and Napolitano’s is off the map. He has let his emotions drive his actions and I have to agree with Trump allegedly telling him no, in regards to a Supreme Court appointment.

Here’s the op-ed from Napolitano that you need to read. It gives his argument against Kavanaugh and after reading this and matching it with his actions over the last year and it all makes sense.

The late Justice Antonin Scalia — my friend during the final 10 years of his life — and his neighbor and colleague Justice Anthony Kennedy often remarked to each other during the Obama years that each would like to leave the Supreme Court upon the election of a Republican president. Scalia’s untimely death in February 2016 denied him that choice, but Kennedy bided his time.

When Trump was elected president, Kennedy told friends that he needed to await Trump’s nominee to replace Scalia to gauge whether the judicially untested Trump could be counted upon to choose a nominee of Kennedy’s liking and Scalia’s standing.

Trump knew Kennedy’s thinking, and that guided him in choosing Neil Gorsuch for Scalia’s seat. Gorsuch believes in the primacy of the individual and natural rights and is generally skeptical of government regulators. He is also a former Kennedy clerk.

Read: Trump — Napolitano Has Been Hostile To Me Ever Since I Said No To His Supreme Court Request

So the Gorsuch selection was intended to serve two purposes. The first was to pick a Scalia-like thinker for the court as candidate Trump had promised, and the second was to give Kennedy a comfort level so he could retire and give President Trump a second nominee. It worked.

When Kennedy paid an unprecedented visit to the Oval Office two weeks ago, ostensibly to tell the president of his intention to retire, he also had a secret purpose — to recommend his replacement. The announcement of Kennedy’s departure began a firestorm of lobbying in behalf of four people from a list of 25 potential nominees that Trump had published when searching for Scalia’s replacement.

The idea of a published list is novel. But it cemented loyalty from conservatives to Trump, who, of course, had no track record in evaluating or appointing judicial nominees. The standards used to put names on the list involved examining academic credentials and published works and, with the exception of one person, requiring judicial experience with a traditionalist bent, even if brief.

Social and religious conservatives pushed the president to nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a fiercely Catholic mother of seven and former Notre Dame Law School professor who is a known opponent of abortion. Intellectual conservatives pushed for Judge Raymond Kethledge, a philosopher like Justice Gorsuch who believes in the primacy of the individual and who recognizes natural rights. The president’s sister Judge Maryanne Trump Barry had her brother convinced that her colleague Judge Thomas Hardiman, a blue-collar diamond-in-the-rough conservative, would fulfill his promise to his base.

Read: Fox News’ Napolitano Doubles Down — Trump’s Actions ‘Unlawful, Defenseless And Condemnable’

But at the last minute, a gaggle of Washington lawyers and lobbyists — called the establishment when you agree with them and the swamp when you don’t — persuaded the president to reject his commitment to his sister and nominate Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is the man Justice Kennedy had asked the president to nominate and is another former Kennedy clerk.

The suspense over all this was palpable earlier this week. The showman in the president beat a drum so effectively last weekend that we all watched with excited pulse rates on Monday night. I was and remain extremely disappointed. Donald Trump — whatever you think of him as a president — has been utterly faithful to his campaign promises in foreign and domestic policy. Until now.

Now he has given us a nominee to the highest court in the land who typifies the culture he railed against when he claimed he’d drain the swamp. This man and this culture accept cutting holes in the Fourth Amendment because they don’t believe that it should protect privacy. This man and this culture accept unlimited spying on innocent Americans by the National Security Agency because they don’t believe that the NSA is subject to the Constitution.

Read: Napolitano SLAMS ‘Amoral, Venal, Deceptive’ Trump: Mueller Report ‘Might Be Enough to Prosecute’ Him

This man and this culture even looked the other way in the face of deep state shenanigans against President Trump himself. This man and this culture accept the federal regulation of health care and its command that everyone buy health insurance, called Obamacare. This man and this culture embrace the Nixonian mantra that if the president does it, it is not illegal.

What happened here?

The Kavanaugh nomination is not a question of his qualifications; it is a question of his values. It is dangerous for judges to embrace values that diminish personal freedom rather than expand it. When they do that, they reveal their view that freedom comes from the government, not from within us. Thomas Jefferson and all the Founding Fathers profoundly rejected the government-as-source-of-freedom argument, but Judge Kavanaugh accepts it.

Jefferson once remarked that unless you pick someone’s pocket or break someone’s leg, no one should care how you exercise your freedom or pursue happiness. I wish the president had nominated a person who believes that, as well. But he didn’t.

Everybody has their opinion regarding the Mueller report which found no collusion with Russia after two years of investigating, and spending millions of taxpayer dollars. Atty Gen William Barr found there was no obstruction which was illegal. Along comes Napolitano and makes all kinds of charges?

LISTEN: Subscribe to the Wayne Dupree Show Podcast on iTunes

The far left media loves that and are running with it as a major news story. So Napolitano knows more than Barr and Mueller, and has proved he is correct? I didn’t know Napolitano had done his own investigation?

I am so tired of all these “experts” voicing their opinions as if they were facts. As if they had all the facts at their disposal, and studied those facts for more than a minute and came up with a non-political, non-biased opinion. Every one of these stories guarantees people like me will vote for Trump in 2020.

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.